Value in departure: Why a Terriers cancellation isn’t the worst thing in the world (but it’s probably close)

Terriers airs its season finale tonight at 10 p.m. on FX. You should, without question, watch it. It is the best new series of the fall and probably my favorite new drama series of the post-WGA strike era. With this being the afternoon before said finale unspools, I could spend a thousand words imploring current fans to watch LIVE tonight or pleading with non-fans to download episodes on iTunes, Amazon or wherever else because god damnit, Terriers is just so damn good.

But I am not going to do that. Other, better writers and critics have already done that kind of thing. Of course, you should listen to them, but that’s not what I am really here to discuss. Instead, because I am apparently an ass, I am here to play devil’s advocate of some sort. So I should probably stop bouncing around my argument because I’m afraid of being struck by lightning and just get to it:

What if…it’s…okay that Terriers gets canceled after the finale episode tonight?

Listen, I know that it is literally NOT OKAY that Terriers gets cancelled, but I couldn’t come up with any better way to phrase it. Trust me, I wrote five other sentences with the same slant. Again, I know it’s not okay if the series gets cancelled, that would be a fairly awful thing. Terriers, based on quality alone, should not be cancelled.

But over the past few days, I’ve been thinking about Terriers and two things really stick out to me about this whole situation.  First of all, I’ve sort of come to the realization that all the “Save ___” campaigns get me away too worked up and invested and while I’ve done some things to help Terriers along, I’ve tried to keep myself detached in some ways to avoid the heartbreak. That might make me a “bad” fan, but with so many things going on for me personally, I just can’t get too worried about unjust cancellations — especially when I have no pull anyway.

Secondly and more importantly, if Terriers goes to the big television heaven in the sky, won’t it go down as one of the best one-and-done series of all-time? And if so, is there anything to be ashamed of in producing one freaking excellent batch of 13 episodes that tells a great, presumably self-contained(ish) story?

Sure, there is no question that if Terriers comes back for a second season, it will probably continue to be awesome. There are no signs of wear and tear or storyline fatigue. It’s not a series that relies on such a large mythology that could perhaps unravel or crash under its own weight. It’s fully supported by great characters, great performances and great writing in such a way that there doesn’t seem to be any notable reason why all those things would suddenly go away. In short, Terriers doesn’t have the ingredients of a one year wonder or anything remotely like that.

However, in America, we put way too much focus on the continuing series. Anything that doesn’t last at least four years or 75 episodes feels like a moderate failure at best. The miniseries is basically dead, aside from the annual HBO historical one that wins all the Emmys that derail any momentum of the actual televised ceremony. Everything is about dragging things out, milking television content for all that it is worth, until there’s really nothing left. Broadly, we don’t understand or see much value in a 13-episode story that begins and ends, with no second season, spin-off or whatever else.

And again, I don’t think Terriers getting a second season is an example of FX dragging things out for financial gain, because A.) it’s only a second season and B.) there is little money to be made on a series that attracts somewhere around 500,000 viewers per episode when they air for the first time. But sometimes, and this might just be one of those cases, it’s alright for a series to come in, beat the hell out of us with a tremendous season of stories and then go away. Moreover, it’s not like the series would really ever go away, the DVDs will exist, the Amazon downloads will exist, it will make its way to Netflix.

Terriers would be one of those cases. If the series is canceled, I think it automatically goes to the top or near the top of the one-and-done television series slideshows that Entertainment Weekly likes to pull out every time a fairly recognizable series gets canceled. I haven’t seen Firefly (mostly because of the incessant hype) or Profit, but I’d be willing to have a discussion about the merits of the likes of Freaks and Geeks and Undeclared versus the merits of Terriers. In fact, I would love to have that discussion.

There is simply a lot to be said for being remembered as one of “the best one season TV series of all-time” versus a lowly-rated, but awesome series that was given two seasons. It’s an unfortunate badge of honor to have, but it’s certainly not the worst thing in the world either. So yeah, clearly, I’d love to have Terriers around next fall and for multiple falls after that. It’s an amazing television program. But after all the hashtagging and crying is over, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with how the series would be remembered, which is one of the best one-year wonders ever. Again, there are much, much worse things.


9 responses to “Value in departure: Why a Terriers cancellation isn’t the worst thing in the world (but it’s probably close)”

  1. Two things:

    1) HOW DARE YOU.

    2) With that out of the way, interesting note about Firefly vs. something like Freaks and Geeks. In the former case, there was mythology to be tapped into – the show was epic, and it was just starting to brush up against those larger storylines (not unlike the start of Buffy). As a result, its loss was considered tragic for largely story reasons.

    With Freaks and Geeks, and I would argue Terriers, its quality-driven: the concern is not that we MUST know what happens after the finale (there are actually some interesting parallels between the F&G finale and the Terriers one that I hadn’t thought of, but you’ll see those tonight), but that we think television will be a better place if the show continues to exist. Our need is driven solely by a desire for more great television, rather than any sort of resolution.

    This does support your argument to some extent, but I would argue that Terriers is in a position where such celebration seems impossible: the fall season was too weak for there to be another champion (the “well at least X survived situation), and anything but a “Well, at least it got more seasons than perhaps it deserves” (The Arrested Development, Veronica Mars) is going to be considered a disappointment in ways that the “before its time” Freaks & Geeks was not.


  2. I’m with Miles.


  3. Noel Kirkpatrick Avatar
    Noel Kirkpatrick

    Well put, Cory.

    While I’ve throughly enjoyed Terriers (and will watch the finale, despite a range of other delectable options, including Pysch‘s Twin Peaks homage and the premiere of Top Chef All Stars), I’ve voiced my frustration with the save the show hype, both on Twitter and on the podcast (and won’t rehash here for fear of angering Myles further) so I find your take on the issue wonderfully refreshing.

    Like you, I see no reason why we shouldn’t be deliriously content with a single beautiful season (hell, I was willing to let Dollhouse go after its first season, and it was a less than beautiful season, but I felt like it had done its job). I will be satisfied should it not be renewed based on what it has provided.

    And then maybe we get a rebooted Knights of Prosperity. I’m just sayin’.

    P.S. You should totally watch Firefly. It is teh_awesome. You get to see Nathan Fillion’s butt. What more could you possibly want from a television show?


  4. You lost me when you said you’ve never seen Firefly. Kidding, mostly. I have to side with Myles on this one. While I will forever be thankful for the amazing season we’ve been gifted and will certainly purchase it if it is made available on DVD, I think a show of this quality should continue past one season because it is so few an far between.

    And you should really watch Firefly. Just because it is a rare instance where it lives up to the hype.


  5. […] ratings, Terriers is the kind of show that needs to survive for reason of quality. In a comment on Cory Barker’s post from earlier, where he wondered whether the show would be more fondly remembered as an amazing one-season wonder […]


  6. Value in departure: Why a Terriers cancellation isn't the worst ……

    Here at World Spinner we are debating the same thing……


  7. […] Even though I suggested it might be fine for Terriers to drive off into the sunset (to Mexico, apparently) after this one great season, I still approached the season finale, “Hail Mary,” with some sadness. The best thing Terriers has done is populate the small world of Ocean Beach, CA with great, quirky characters that I don’t want to have missing from my life — even for a short period of time. Hank, Britt, Katie, Gretchen, Mark, Laura, Steph and even the three members of the OB geek squad, I love them all. […]


  8. […] and acted program in this, the age of Bridalplasty and Skating With the Stars, I have to agree with Corey Barker to an extent and simply appreciate the gift of its one pitch-perfect and high quality […]


  9. […] But much like with Terriers, I am still very satisfied with the 13 episodes of Code I was able to watch and I won’t be overwhelmingly sad when it doesn’t get picked up by FX, TNT or whomever. I understand the economic rationale of keeping series on the air for as long as possible with as many episodes as possible, but I’ve grown especially fond of the one-and-dones this season has brought us. For whatever reason, it’s brought us a number of them, from Code and Terriers to Lights Out and Rubicon. There’s obviously a reason audiences have clung to these series, which I detailed here, but I’m fairly satisfied with what I saw. Authors are able to write just one book in a world and we’re okay with that, but in film and television, success is determined so much on longevity, sequels, more, more, more and it’s just disappointing. I absolutely think that Shawn Ryan could make a fantastic second season of The Chicago Code, one probably better than the sometimes problematic first. But the ifs and maybes aren’t going to damage my enjoyment of this season, especially these last four episodes that proved the series had the ability to kick its storytelling engine into another gear. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: